<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Promoting MS to RMS : USE WITH CAUTION!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bradstechblog.com/scom/promoting-ms-to-rms-use-with-caution/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bradstechblog.com/scom/promoting-ms-to-rms-use-with-caution</link>
	<description>Microsoft technologies like: System Center Operations Manager, and whatever else comes up at the office.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:55:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brad Hearn</title>
		<link>http://bradstechblog.com/scom/promoting-ms-to-rms-use-with-caution/comment-page-1#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Hearn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradstechblog.com/?p=13#comment-494</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris, Promoting is a simple task. But make sure you follow the steps. If done wrong it can create more issues for you when you are ready to bring the original RMS online. If you need to promote your MS due to a full cluster loss. And you plan to return to the cluster after it has been resorted. Then you will need to to promote the virtual RMS only. Do not promote the nodes. If you were to do this you could introduce multiple RMS&#039;s into AD and will been then be stuck with the ugly job of cleaning up SPN&#039;s.

 If you need to rebuild the cluster. You would promote to the MS first. Make sure you perform a full promotion and removal of the old RMS when you do this. Rebuild your cluster and then promote it again. Send me a note if you have any questions through this. 

Brad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris, Promoting is a simple task. But make sure you follow the steps. If done wrong it can create more issues for you when you are ready to bring the original RMS online. If you need to promote your MS due to a full cluster loss. And you plan to return to the cluster after it has been resorted. Then you will need to to promote the virtual RMS only. Do not promote the nodes. If you were to do this you could introduce multiple RMS&#8217;s into AD and will been then be stuck with the ugly job of cleaning up SPN&#8217;s.</p>
<p> If you need to rebuild the cluster. You would promote to the MS first. Make sure you perform a full promotion and removal of the old RMS when you do this. Rebuild your cluster and then promote it again. Send me a note if you have any questions through this. </p>
<p>Brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Rundle</title>
		<link>http://bradstechblog.com/scom/promoting-ms-to-rms-use-with-caution/comment-page-1#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rundle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradstechblog.com/?p=13#comment-493</guid>
		<description>If the RMS is clustered, but both nodes go down (network failure, rack destruction etc) and you promote a MS to be the temporary RMS, when the cluster is bought back online, do BOTH nodes need to be demoted/promoted to RMS, or just the virtual RMS? Same question applies if the cluster needs to be rebuilt - in that case there would still be a clustered MS to demote/promote.
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the RMS is clustered, but both nodes go down (network failure, rack destruction etc) and you promote a MS to be the temporary RMS, when the cluster is bought back online, do BOTH nodes need to be demoted/promoted to RMS, or just the virtual RMS? Same question applies if the cluster needs to be rebuilt &#8211; in that case there would still be a clustered MS to demote/promote.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Theuma</title>
		<link>http://bradstechblog.com/scom/promoting-ms-to-rms-use-with-caution/comment-page-1#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Theuma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradstechblog.com/?p=13#comment-476</guid>
		<description>Do you know if they have sorted this out in SP2 or hav eyou tried it as yet.
Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know if they have sorted this out in SP2 or hav eyou tried it as yet.<br />
Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max inglis</title>
		<link>http://bradstechblog.com/scom/promoting-ms-to-rms-use-with-caution/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>max inglis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradstechblog.com/?p=13#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I love it when the MS tech guys haven&#039;t actually tried this stuff themselves...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it when the MS tech guys haven&#8217;t actually tried this stuff themselves&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
